here's an old saying: he is a fool, who relies on aphorisms. Doesn't say much for those of you who rely on mine, week after week. But what choice have you? If I did not use my reviews principally to remind you of why you read them, you would not know that you do so because they are astute; and you would be baffled by the little life lessons and truisms I pass along about me. And you would attempt to contact me at home again, and then I let loose the beagles, and frankly that is all very disappointing for you. I hope that clarifies things.
There. Well, enough about me.

ait, not quite enough. You know, artistic opinion is kind of like, say, one's religion: everyone thinks his own is superior. But only few are correct. For example, I had the pleasure of critiquing the performance of Gov. Mike Lowry at a recent press conference. And I admit I was rather harsh: frankly, I think affecting an infirmity is an amateurish ploy. Anyway, after the review was printed, I was as usual obliged to eavesdrop on comments like: "Walter knows nothing about acting. Walter's never acted in his life. Walter cannot even act like himself."
Sigh. It's not easy being me. Sometimes even I have trouble with it. I am a complex person. But at least I am confident in this: the rest of you are absolutely awful at it.
I'll explain it slowly and that'll be the end of it. No, I cannot act. But I can act like I cannot. It comes naturally to me. And that qualifies me to judge the acting incompetence of others. There.
Dunno why critics are envied so. Maybe it's because we know something most people do not: what's wrong with them. There are even those who say that critics serve no function: proof that you should leave the complaining to the experts. I mean, think about it: Food Critic John Hinterberger steers us through the typos on the Sizzler's menu; Dear Abby's advice to the love-lorn is still fresh even after 40 years and a burst aneurysm in her temporal lobe; Barbara Walters always leaves us wondering what it was she just said. No function? Really, now. Imagine how chaotic our lives would be if we were fired.
And me? I am the friend who clarifies for you why I like the things I do when no explanation seems plausible. Art critics find ingenious ways to approve of rap music, drag-queen theater, and other things which serve no function and which frankly frighten us. Artists create art; art critics keep them from being run out of town. So we are more important. If it was not for me, that thing hanging on the wall would be no more than some ... some food stain. Thrown there in petulant anger. Alright, on closer inspection it turns out that is in fact what it is [review next week]. So I know what I'm talking about.
There. And now you are saying, "That Walter. Every week he starts off his reviews by talking about himself. Nevertheless, although I do not care to have these words attributed to me, or even to read them aloud, I must admit that I have indeed been compelled to read this far. Hmm. Maybe he is astute. And I am the pompous ass."
Now I believe we are ready for the review.

ut first a few explanatory notes about myself. You know, whenever I choose to explore Seattle's galleries and museums and exult in the rich, vivid artistic opinions of mine, I am reminded that, although I know little about art, and do not pretend to, I know so very much about art critique. And I think: all these ... artists. And their paintings and such. Don't they realize I could fix their stuff for a small fee if only they'd let me or even speak to me? No: they prefer the darkness. Guess they don't read my column: maybe they just don't read.

Well, now I can do them this great service without their permission. Our friends at Entros have closed the creative gap between art and critic by introducing the Entros Gallery of Fine Art.
Entros has been a provider of virtual goods and services in Seattle since the 50's, but this is their first venture into the entertainment industry. Using the magic of virtual-reality goggles, the EGFA has on hand all the best masterpieces of art in an electronic "gallery" through which you "walk" so as to "enjoy" them. Entros boasts that their reproductions are better and more accurate than the originals, since they are not blocked by mobs of plebeians.
The EGFA is located in the inviting new Belltown Mall. My host for the day, manager Glenn Milliman, was there to greet me. "Two dollars, bud."
I smiled grimly. "Two dollars, please, bud." Those who can, do. Those who cannot do, critique those who can. "Consider that your gratuity."
He did, and escorted me to the virtual-reality chamber, where he fitted me with the goggles, strapped me to the gurney, administered 20 cc's of morphine, and kicked on the juice.
Interesting. Before me I beheld the electronic gallery, which I entered with an air of ennui. Gift-shop, espresso-bar, and, beyond, endless corridors upon whose walls hung history's recognizable masterworks of art.
"Remarkable," I said. "And you say they're ... they're not real?"
"If they were real, you wouldn't need the goggles to see them."
He forgot to say "please" again, but I let it slide. You know, virtual reality is different, and like all different things it could use some improvement. I noticed I suffered a couple of harmless seizures, and there were periodic - though welcome - interruptions by CNN, and what I believe were eerie, dadaist Hertz commercials. A person is free to smoke in this imaginary world, and that was nice; but I found it disorienting, having no one watch me disapprove of the paintings.
I came to Jackson Pollack's multicolored Food Stain, Pt. 1, and watched it piously for a time. "I don't understand it," I said properly, "But, by god, it's making me think." Making me think about how idiotic artists are, I also thought. Thank god for art critics. I moved on.
Now, I personally do not like the Louvre because Parisians do not bathe, so even if I had ever been to Europe I would not have seen Da Vinci's popular Mona Lisa in person. But I can promise you that the Entros rendition is just as lifelike as in the reproductions. There she was. That sepia smile. The quixotic nose. Hint of cleavage. I could not help but think: what ... what quirk of fate will save me from my boredom?
Brainstorm to the rescue. "Milliman!" I barked. "Hand me one of those virtual Magic Markers. Quick, man!"
Pen in hand, I marched up to the painting and intuitively sketched on it a bold, disembodied Rubik's Cube, thinking: of course: a Rubik's Cube! Witty; infuriating; ethnic-sounding.
I stood back. There.
You know, they didn't have Rubik's Cubes in Da Vinci's day, and, frankly, it shows.
Moving on, I soon encountered a charming group portrait by Grandma Moses and accessorized it with tasteful Mapplethorpian bullwhips gently ensconced where, in most people, the sun don't shine. Finally a Grandma Moses painting that one can enjoy without squirming.
I have to admit I was a bit baffled at first by Magritte's world-famous dadaist sculpture of a toilet entitled, "Ceci N'est Pas Une Toilette" (This Is Not A Toilet). And I remember thinking: clever and all that. So where is the goddamn toilet? Then I remembered: this is not a real sculpture, but a virtual one. So I went ahead and used it. Good thing the seat was already down,
The Entros Gallery of Upgraded Classics is open
M-F, 10am to 8pm. 206-812-1916.

Back to Page 8 or Page 9
Seattle
Whitely
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16